Compare / Traditional tools

Unforged Nib vs traditional signature verification tools

Tools differ, and we won’t guess at anyone else’s. Here is what Nib does on each point, and the question worth asking of any tool you are weighing up.

In short Tools differ, so ask each one the same questions. Unforged Nib compares each signature with the person’s own references, gives one of six verdicts with reasons, and publishes its price: $0.50 per check.

  • AUTO APPROVE
  • APPROVE
  • FLAG
  • FAILED
  • UNREADABLE
  • NO SIGNATURE

Side by side

What to ask of any tool and Unforged Nib, point by point
PointWhat to ask of any toolUnforged Nib
What a signature is compared againstDoes it compare each signature with that person’s own references, or with a general idea of a genuine signature?The person's own reference signatures, enrolled once, and how much that person usually varies.
How the verdict is explainedDoes every answer come with reasons you could show an auditor, or only a score?One of six verdicts, a calibrated probability from 0 to 1 with a band, and plain-language reasons you can show an auditor.
ConsistencyDoes each result record the settings and version that produced it?Every document goes through the same steps and your policy’s thresholds. Each result records the policy and version that produced it.
SpeedCan it answer one signature as it is signed, as well as in batches?Each check answers when it finishes: streamed as it runs, or by signed webhook. Batches go in by bucket drop.
Audit trailIs there an append-only log of who changed what, and how long is it kept?Reasons, probability, policy and version on every result, and an append-only audit log kept 400 days.
Unclear casesWhat happens to a poor image, a missing signature or a borderline case? Are you charged for them?FLAG sends it to a person. FAILED always goes to a person, never automatic. UNREADABLE asks for a better image, free.
Pricing modelIs the price published, and what exactly counts as one billable unit?$0.50 per check. A check is one document checked against one person’s references, however many signatures it holds. UNREADABLE and NO SIGNATURE results, and enrolling references, are free. Volume pricing and invoicing on Talk to us plans.
Data handlingWhere are documents processed and stored, and are they ever used to train the product?Hosted in London (AWS eu-west-2). Used only to run your checks, never for training. Kept as long as your retention setting says.
IntegrationIs there a documented API, webhooks, and a way to send batches without writing code?A REST API described in OpenAPI 3.1, bucket drop (S3), signed webhooks, and a dashboard with check history and exports.

How to run a fair trial

Whichever tools you compare, test them the same way:

  • Use your own documents

    Your forms, scans and phone photos, not a vendor’s samples.

  • Include known forgeries

    And genuine signatures that vary, so you see both kinds of mistake.

  • Look at the unclear cases

    Where does each tool send them, and what does a reviewer see?

  • Count the cost per document

    Including the ones that come back unreadable or unsigned.

Try it

See it on your own documents.

New organisations get $10 of credit, no card needed.